Migration assurance
listTransactions financial event group id
listTransactions financial event group id focuses on migration mapping and reconciliation evidence, not generic API copy. Use it to turn a vague migration into a reviewable test case.
- Target keyword: listTransactions financial event group id
- Removed: listFinancialEventsByGroupId
- Replacement: listTransactions relatedIdentifierName=FINANCIAL_EVENT_GROUP_ID
- Removal date: August 27, 2027
TL;DR
| Deprecated item | Removal date | Replacement | Migration risk | Scanner detection |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| listFinancialEventsByGroupId | August 27, 2027 | listTransactions relatedIdentifierName=FINANCIAL_EVENT_GROUP_ID | Group-level reconciliation can look plausible while filtering the wrong identifier or period. | AMZ-FIN-FILTER-001, AMZ-FIN-RECON-001 |
Official status
Amazon documentation lists listFinancialEventsByGroupId as in-scope for this migration. Use the official source before code freeze because deadlines and replacement details can change.
Amazon Finances API v2024-06-19 reference Amazon SP-API deprecation schedule
Production Finances validation plan
Finances migration must protect accounting completeness. The validator evidence should be paired with a manifest that proves windows, nextToken pagination, recursive breakdowns and expected totals for representative close periods.
| Validation area | Production proof to collect |
|---|---|
| Date windows | Split requests into 180-day-or-smaller UTC windows and record the generated ranges. |
| Pagination | Continue on empty pages when nextToken exists and preserve postedAfter/postedBefore on every token request. |
| Breakdowns | Reconcile recursive amounts with deterministic decimals instead of floats. |
| Identifiers | Validate order, settlement and transaction identifiers against expected ledger joins. |
Mapping table
listTransactions financial event group id should be implemented as a small, reviewable mapping table before release.
| Old field or behavior | New field or behavior | Validation rule |
|---|---|---|
| Group ID input | relatedIdentifierValue | Use the original financial event group ID. |
| Filter name | relatedIdentifierName=FINANCIAL_EVENT_GROUP_ID | Do not omit the filter name. |
| Close period | postedAfter/postedBefore window | Keep group validation tied to the accounting period. |
Validation scenario
Validate one close period where finance expects a known group-level total and compare recursive breakdowns.
| Input evidence | Expected proof |
|---|---|
| Source scan finding | AMZ-FIN-FILTER-001, AMZ-FIN-RECON-001 points to the old implementation. |
| Sample data | The migration sample covers the field, status, amount or identifier in this page. |
| Reviewer output | A short reconciliation note explains every accepted delta. |
Parser or reconciliation example
Use this as the shape of the unit test or review snippet; adjust names to your codebase.
await listTransactions({ postedAfter, postedBefore, relatedIdentifierName: 'FINANCIAL_EVENT_GROUP_ID', relatedIdentifierValue: groupId });Removed resource and replacement
| Old resource | Replacement | Deadline | Validation outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| listFinancialEventsByGroupId | listTransactions relatedIdentifierName=FINANCIAL_EVENT_GROUP_ID | August 27, 2027 | Group-level reconciliation can look plausible while filtering the wrong identifier or period. |
What breaks
| Area | Breakage |
|---|---|
| Code pattern | Code still assumes listFinancialEventsByGroupId. |
| Payload or schema | The migration target is listTransactions relatedIdentifierName=FINANCIAL_EVENT_GROUP_ID, so shape, naming or grouping changes. |
| Permission or data access | Field visibility, role access or accounting availability can differ by marketplace and workflow. |
| Pagination, status or field mapping | Mapping mistakes can hide under successful HTTP responses unless samples are reconciled. |
Before/after example
The example is intentionally small so the migration shape is visible in a code review.
Before:
// Old assumption
listFinancialEventsByGroupId
After:
await listTransactions({ postedAfter, postedBefore, relatedIdentifierName: 'FINANCIAL_EVENT_GROUP_ID', relatedIdentifierValue: groupId });Scanner detection
| Rule ID | Severity | Evidence pattern | False positive condition | Validation step |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZ-FIN-FILTER-001, AMZ-FIN-RECON-001 | HIGH when mapping drift affects accounting, PII or order state | listFinancialEventsByGroupId | Documentation, comments, generated clients or test fixtures can require manual review. | Capture one production-like sample for listFinancialEventsByGroupId. |
Migration checklist
- Capture one production-like sample for listFinancialEventsByGroupId.
- Normalize it into listTransactions relatedIdentifierName=FINANCIAL_EVENT_GROUP_ID.
- Run the mapping table against the sample and record unmatched fields.
- Reconcile the expected totals, statuses, identifiers or access flags.
- Attach the mapping output to the migration ticket.
- Re-scan source and keep the sample evidence with the release gate.
Common mistakes
- Mapping field names without proving semantic equivalence.
- Using one happy-path sample instead of boundary samples.
- Skipping re-scan after the mapper or parser is patched.
Sample report preview
The public sample report shows the same evidence shape used by paid reports: rule ID, severity, file location, redacted evidence, migration mapping, validation step and quality gate.
FAQ
What should listTransactions financial event group id prove?
It should prove that listFinancialEventsByGroupId maps safely to listTransactions relatedIdentifierName=FINANCIAL_EVENT_GROUP_ID for the tested workflow.
What evidence belongs in the ticket?
The source finding, mapping table result, sample input, normalized output and reconciliation note.
Can the page replace production validation?
No. It gives the mapping contract and sample gate; production rollout still needs staged validation.
How does the scanner help?
It flags AMZ-FIN-FILTER-001, AMZ-FIN-RECON-001 evidence and links findings to the relevant mapping or validator page.
Official sources
Validate listTransactions financial event group id in your source
Run a static scan, review the sample report shape, then unlock the detailed migration report when the evidence is useful.