Migration assurance
PaymentExecutionDetail missing Orders API v2026
PaymentExecutionDetail missing Orders API v2026 is a real Amazon SP-API troubleshooting query. This page explains the likely cause, how to check code evidence, how to validate the fix, and where API Migration Guard can catch the pattern.
- Target keyword: PaymentExecutionDetail missing Orders API v2026
- Removed: PaymentExecutionDetail-style payment dependency
- Replacement: validate payment, invoice and proceeds consumers against supported v2026 data
- Removal date: March 27, 2027
TL;DR
| Deprecated item | Removal date | Replacement | Migration risk | Scanner detection |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PaymentExecutionDetail-style payment dependency | March 27, 2027 | validate payment, invoice and proceeds consumers against supported v2026 data | Invoice, tax or reconciliation jobs can silently lose payment context after a superficial Orders v2026 migration. | AMZ-ORD-PAYMENT-001, AMZ-ORD-INCLUDED-DATA-001 |
Official status
Amazon documentation lists PaymentExecutionDetail-style payment dependency as in-scope for this migration. Use the official source before code freeze because deadlines and replacement details can change.
Amazon Orders API migration guide Amazon SP-API deprecation schedule
Production Orders validation plan
Orders migrations need same-order parity checks because the v2026 model consolidates data that v0 teams often fetched through separate buyer, address and item calls. Treat each finding as a prompt to validate a captured order before code freeze.
| Validation area | Production proof to collect |
|---|---|
| includedData | Record which paths require BUYER, RECIPIENT and ITEMS and confirm role approval for each marketplace. |
| Payload parity | Compare one shipped, one unshipped and one cancelled order against the legacy consumer contract. |
| Pagination | Exercise paginationToken with the original search filters and confirm retry behavior for expired tokens. |
| Downstream jobs | Re-run tax, fulfillment, notification and support workflows that consume order fields. |
Quick answer
PaymentExecutionDetail missing Orders API v2026 usually means legacy payment-detail consumers expect a field that is not available in the same v2026 order shape. The fastest check is: Search for PaymentExecutionDetail, payment method branching and invoice builders.
| Symptom | Fast check | Likely owner |
|---|---|---|
| legacy payment-detail consumers expect a field that is not available in the same v2026 order shape. | Search for PaymentExecutionDetail, payment method branching and invoice builders. | API/platform owner plus finance, orders or support reviewer as applicable. |
Why this happens
This troubleshooting page is tied to PaymentExecutionDetail-style payment dependency, not a generic SP-API failure.
| Cause | What to verify |
|---|---|
| Cause 1 | The integration reads PaymentExecutionDetail directly from v0 order payloads. |
| Cause 2 | The v2026 request omits PROCEEDS or payment-related includedData where supported. |
| Cause 3 | Payment detail is being used for invoice or marketplace-specific tax logic without a fallback. |
| Cause 4 | The migration treats missing payment detail as redaction instead of a schema change. |
How to detect it in your code
Search the source, scheduled jobs, generated clients, report configuration and sample fixtures before assuming the issue is only live data.
const payment = order.PaymentExecutionDetail ?? order.payment ?? order.proceeds;
assertPaymentConsumerHasSupportedInput(payment);Fix checklist
- Find every code path reading PaymentExecutionDetail.
- Map each consumer to v2026 payment/proceeds data or a supported external source.
- Add tests for Brazil/NF-e or invoice flows that need payment data.
- Document any unavailable parity as a product limitation.
- Run Orders payload parity with PROCEEDS where applicable.
- Re-scan source for legacy payment field names.
Migration risk
Invoice, tax or reconciliation jobs can silently lose payment context after a superficial Orders v2026 migration.
| Production surface | Risk if ignored |
|---|---|
| Accounting/order/support workflow | Invoice, tax or reconciliation jobs can silently lose payment context after a superficial Orders v2026 migration. |
| Release gate | The migration can look complete while the runtime job still fails or silently loses data. |
| Audit evidence | Without a preserved sample, reviewers cannot distinguish an accepted limitation from a migration bug. |
How API Migration Guard checks it
API Migration Guard scans for exact operation names, report type constants, endpoint strings, query parameters, parser assumptions and token/window loops. Paid reports add file-level findings, remediation notes, sample validation steps, CSV/JSON/SARIF exports and an evidence package.
| Rule | Evidence | Validation |
|---|---|---|
| AMZ-ORD-PAYMENT-001, AMZ-ORD-INCLUDED-DATA-001 | PaymentExecutionDetail-style payment dependency | Re-scan source for legacy payment field names. |
Removed resource and replacement
| Old resource | Replacement | Deadline | Validation outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| PaymentExecutionDetail-style payment dependency | validate payment, invoice and proceeds consumers against supported v2026 data | March 27, 2027 | Invoice, tax or reconciliation jobs can silently lose payment context after a superficial Orders v2026 migration. |
What breaks
| Area | Breakage |
|---|---|
| Code pattern | Runtime or source evidence points at PaymentExecutionDetail-style payment dependency. |
| Payload or schema | legacy payment-detail consumers expect a field that is not available in the same v2026 order shape. |
| Permission or data access | The integration reads PaymentExecutionDetail directly from v0 order payloads. |
| Pagination, status or field mapping | The migration treats missing payment detail as redaction instead of a schema change. |
Before/after example
The example is intentionally small so the migration shape is visible in a code review.
Before:
const payment = order.PaymentExecutionDetail ?? order.payment ?? order.proceeds;
assertPaymentConsumerHasSupportedInput(payment);
After:
// Fix path: validate payment, invoice and proceeds consumers against supported v2026 data
// Validate with API Migration Guard, sample evidence and a re-scan.Scanner detection
| Rule ID | Severity | Evidence pattern | False positive condition | Validation step |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZ-ORD-PAYMENT-001, AMZ-ORD-INCLUDED-DATA-001 | HIGH for runtime error evidence; BLOCKER when tied to removed resources | PaymentExecutionDetail-style payment dependency | Documentation, comments, generated clients or test fixtures can require manual review. | Find every code path reading PaymentExecutionDetail. |
Migration checklist
- Find every code path reading PaymentExecutionDetail.
- Map each consumer to v2026 payment/proceeds data or a supported external source.
- Add tests for Brazil/NF-e or invoice flows that need payment data.
- Document any unavailable parity as a product limitation.
- Run Orders payload parity with PROCEEDS where applicable.
- Re-scan source for legacy payment field names.
Common mistakes
- Treating PaymentExecutionDetail missing Orders API v2026 as a transient Amazon outage before checking the request shape.
- Changing code without preserving a sample request, response and report evidence.
- Closing the ticket without re-scanning source and validating the affected sample.
Sample report preview
The public sample report shows the same evidence shape used by paid reports: rule ID, severity, file location, redacted evidence, migration mapping, validation step and quality gate.
FAQ
How do I fix PaymentExecutionDetail missing Orders API v2026?
Confirm the request evidence, apply the validate payment, invoice and proceeds consumers against supported v2026 data path, validate the sample and re-scan.
Can API Migration Guard detect PaymentExecutionDetail missing Orders API v2026?
It detects source patterns related to AMZ-ORD-PAYMENT-001, AMZ-ORD-INCLUDED-DATA-001 and shows evidence, remediation notes and validation steps.
Does the free scan call Amazon?
No. It scans uploaded or pasted source statically and can validate pasted samples without Amazon credentials.
When should this become a paid report?
When the free scan finds matching production evidence and the team needs file-level findings, SARIF, CSV or handoff artifacts.
Official sources
Validate PaymentExecutionDetail missing Orders API v2026 in your source
Run a static scan, review the sample report shape, then unlock the detailed migration report when the evidence is useful.