Migration assurance
Amazon SP-API migration: migration guide and scanner checklist
Amazon SP-API migration explains what replaces Orders v0 operations, legacy settlement reports and Finances v0 financial-event operations, the removal date, the migration risks to validate, and how API Migration Guard detects the pattern.
- Target keyword: Amazon SP-API migration
- Removed: Orders v0 operations, legacy settlement reports and Finances v0 financial-event operations
- Replacement: Orders v2026-01-01, Settlement Flat File V2 and Finances listTransactions
- Removal date: 2026-2027 staged removals
TL;DR
| Deprecated item | Removal date | Replacement | Migration risk | Scanner detection |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orders v0 operations, legacy settlement reports and Finances v0 financial-event operations | 2026-2027 staged removals | Orders v2026-01-01, Settlement Flat File V2 and Finances listTransactions | A broad cutover can miss one module-specific blocker and still fail at deadline. | AMZ-ORD-OPERATION-001, AMZ-SET-REPORT-001, AMZ-FIN-OP-001 |
Official status
Amazon documentation lists Orders v0 operations, legacy settlement reports and Finances v0 financial-event operations as in-scope for this migration. Use the official source before code freeze because deadlines and replacement details can change.
Amazon SP-API deprecation schedule Amazon SP-API deprecation schedule
Production buying workflow
This page is written for a real migration decision, not a generic lead form. The free scan should answer whether the codebase contains deadline-linked evidence; the sample report should prove the artifact shape; the paid unlock should only happen when the team needs file-level findings, remediation notes and exportable evidence.
| Stage | User question | Page evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Free scan | Do we have deprecated SP-API usage? | Rule IDs, severity and redacted evidence preview. |
| Sample report | Can engineering use the output? | HTML, JSON, CSV, SARIF and evidence package examples. |
| Paid unlock | Is the evidence actionable enough to buy? | Detailed findings, validation checklist and exportable handoff package. |
Executive cutover map
Use this page as the executive map for the entire cutover. Orders, Settlement and Finances should not share one release gate: each module has a different Amazon deadline, data-loss mode and proof artifact.
- Settlement is the first hard deadline and needs parser plus finance reconciliation proof.
- Orders needs buyer, recipient, item, status and pagination parity before the March 2027 removal.
- Finances needs listTransactions windowing, pagination and recursive breakdown totals before close workflows move.
- The paid report should become the migration evidence packet, not a generic website receipt.
Removed resource and replacement
| Old resource | Replacement | Deadline | Validation outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Orders v0 operations, legacy settlement reports and Finances v0 financial-event operations | Orders v2026-01-01, Settlement Flat File V2 and Finances listTransactions | 2026-2027 staged removals | A broad cutover can miss one module-specific blocker and still fail at deadline. |
What breaks
| Area | Breakage |
|---|---|
| Code pattern | Teams miss deprecated usage hidden in source, fixtures, generated clients or parser utilities. |
| Payload or schema | Output can appear healthy while API/report payload shape changed underneath. |
| Permission or data access | Access, role, retention or payment boundaries can block the commercial handoff. |
| Pagination, status or field mapping | Pagination, deadlines and sample-data reconciliation need module-specific validation. |
Before/after example
The example is intentionally small so the migration shape is visible in a code review.
Before:
legacyClient.getOrders(); legacyReport('GET_V2_SETTLEMENT_REPORT_DATA_XML'); listFinancialEvents();
After:
run API Migration Guard, fix module blockers, validate samples, then re-scanScanner detection
| Rule ID | Severity | Evidence pattern | False positive condition | Validation step |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZ-ORD-OPERATION-001, AMZ-SET-REPORT-001, AMZ-FIN-OP-001 | Depends on module and evidence type | Orders v0 operations, legacy settlement reports and Finances v0 financial-event operations | Documentation, comments, generated clients or test fixtures can require manual review. | Run a free scan across Orders, Settlement and Finances source paths. |
Migration checklist
- Run a free scan across Orders, Settlement and Finances source paths.
- Open the sample report to confirm evidence shape and export expectations.
- Prioritize blocker findings by deadline and module ownership.
- Unlock the detailed report only after the free scan shows useful evidence.
Common mistakes
- Optimizing for broad migration wording before capturing exact operation/report queries.
- Treating static analysis as absolute proof instead of tested-scope evidence.
- Sending traffic to pricing without a sample report, methodology and free scan path.
Sample report preview
The public sample report shows the same evidence shape used by paid reports: rule ID, severity, file location, redacted evidence, migration mapping, validation step and quality gate.
FAQ
Who is Amazon SP-API migration for?
Developers, agencies and SaaS teams preparing Amazon SP-API cutovers.
Does the tool execute code?
No. It uses static analysis and sample validators only.
What should I do after a free scan?
Review the evidence, inspect the sample report format and unlock the detailed report if the findings are actionable.
Official sources
Validate Amazon SP-API migration in your source
Run a static scan, review the sample report shape, then unlock the detailed migration report when the evidence is useful.